BPC-157 + TB-500 + KPV (aliases none on file) has 2 lab tests on file on Peptigrity from 2 shops and 2 laboratories, most recent 2026-08-13. Median reported purity 99.85%; 100% of results at or above 99%; 0 results compare measured to labelled quantity; 2 results report endotoxin. Price per mg is not published for blends. Peptigrity publishes measurements, not dosing advice. Figures as of 2026-09-24.
BPC-157 + TB-500 + KPV blend
3-peptide research blend in one vial: BPC-157 + TB-500 + KPV. A widely discussed tissue-repair research stack combining BPC-157 (gastric repair peptide), TB-500 (actin-regulating repair peptide), and KPV (an anti-inflammatory tripeptide) — three complementary angles on healing and inflammation.
Composition
A blend has one whole-vial purity, but the number that decides what you're holding is the net content of each component — an HPLC run resolves a separate peak for each. So we verify BPC-157 + TB-500 + KPV component by component. Each links to its own compound page, where its full independent testing lives.
Typical BPC-157 + TB-500 + KPV formulation
| Component | Typical mg | Role in the blend | Verified purity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPC-157 | varies | Angiogenic / growth-factor-mediated tissue repair | 99.4% · 877 tests | View testing → |
| TB-500 | varies | Actin-driven cell migration and systemic recovery signalling | 99.4% · 417 tests | View testing → |
| KPV | varies | Anti-inflammatory α-MSH tripeptide (NF-κB pathway) | 99.6% · 264 tests | View testing → |
Composition varies by vendor. The components above are consistent across shops, but the milligrams and ratio are not — always dose by the individual component amounts printed on your vial, never by a generic “blend dose.”
How you verify a blend
A blend is the single hardest product to trust — the whole-vial purity tells you the material is clean, but not whether every peptide is present in the right amount. Two questions decide that, and both are answerable in a lab.
Is every component actually present?
Mass spec (or a clean HPLC peak per compound) confirms each peptide is in the vial — not one short, not a cheaper substitute standing in for the expensive one.
Does each match the label?
Tested milligrams vs. labelled milligrams, per component. This is where blends fail quietly — one component underdosed to pad margin while the vial still “contains” everything.
BPC-157 + TB-500 + KPV tested as a vial
Tests run on a BPC-157 + TB-500 + KPV vial as sold — broken down per component. This is the data no shop and no competitor publishes.
| Component | Labelled | Net content (tested) | Identity (LC-MS) | Vs. label |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KPV | — | 10.65 mg | ✓ present | — |
| TB-500 | — | 10.77 mg | ✓ present | — |
| BPC-157 | — | 10.46 mg | ✓ present | — |
| Component | Labelled | Net content (tested) | Identity (LC-MS) | Vs. label |
|---|
Verified purity of each ingredient
Until more BPC-157 + TB-500 + KPV vials are tested, the strongest signal is how each component performs in single-compound testing across the shops we track. Tap any card for its full data.
About BPC-157 + TB-500 + KPV
Last Updated: August 2026
Last Updated: August 2026
This is the classic tissue-repair research stack: BPC-157 (a gastric pentadecapeptide studied for angiogenesis and growth-factor-mediated repair), TB-500 (the actin-binding thymosin β4 fragment studied for cell migration and repair), and KPV (Lys-Pro-Val, the C-terminal tripeptide of α-MSH, studied for its anti-inflammatory action). It is research-use-only, not an approved product. Adding cosmetic GHK-Cu to this trio makes the four-peptide KLOW blend; dropping KPV leaves the two-peptide Wolverine healing pair.
Why are these three combined?
The pairing logic is complementary mechanisms: BPC-157 and TB-500 approach tissue repair through different pathways (growth-factor/angiogenic signaling vs actin-driven cell migration), while KPV adds an anti-inflammatory angle by dampening pro-inflammatory signaling (NF-κB) — so the stack aims to support repair while modulating the inflammation that accompanies injury. This is a mechanistic rationale, not a proven combined outcome.
What's the evidence and status?
The individual components have varying (largely preclinical) research bases, but the combination has not been validated in controlled human trials; it is an experiential/research stack, and BPC-157 and TB-500 are prohibited in sport (WADA). See each component's profile for its own evidence. Always dose by the individual component amounts printed on your vial, never by a generic "blend dose" — and because composition varies by vendor, re-check them for every batch. Evidence level: Component-level, largely preclinical; blend not clinically validated.
What is the regulatory status of BPC-157 + TB-500 + KPV's components?
None of the three peptides is approved by the FDA — or any other regulator — for human use as of August 2026; all three are sold strictly as research-use-only material. In April 2026 the FDA removed BPC-157, TB-500 and KPV from its 503A Category 2 bulk-substances list because the nominations had been withdrawn by the nominators — an administrative removal that did not add them to Category 1 or authorise pharmacy compounding. At its July 23–24, 2026 meeting the FDA's Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee voted to recommend BPC-157, TB-500 and KPV (each 8–6–1) for the 503A compounding list — advisory recommendations the FDA's own reviewers had opposed, which the agency has not finalized; formal rulemaking is not expected before 2027. In sport, BPC-157 is prohibited by WADA under S0 and TB-500/thymosin β4 under S2.3 (Growth Factors); KPV is not named on the WADA Prohibited List. Evidence level: regulatory status only — none FDA-approved; all three components largely preclinical (BPC-157 zero RCTs, TB-500 no human trial of the fragment, KPV no human trials); the blend has no controlled human trial.
How does Peptigrity verify a three-part blend?
Confirm each labeled component is present, correctly identified, and adequately pure via HPLC and mass-spec. Peptigrity collects independent third-party Certificates of Analysis for the BPC-157, TB-500 and KPV components from shops' official channels and verifies each for authenticity before publishing; because shops choose which COAs to publish, results reflect the batches shops have made public rather than every production batch — a selection bias we state openly, and a community-funded Testing Grant to purchase and test vials anonymously is in development. The trust score weights lab purity and reviews equally (50/50). Tests in the database come from independent labs such as Janoshik Analytical, Freedom Diagnostics, and Chromate. See the COA red-flags guide.
Educational information only; not medical advice. This is a research-use-only stack, not an approved therapy. Consult a qualified healthcare provider. Peptigrity does not sell, endorse, or recommend products or vendors.
Reconstitute & measure a blend
In a blend you can only set the dose of one component — the rest follow the fixed ratio. Our calculator does that math so you don't underdose the peptide you actually care about.
Blend calculator
Enter each component's milligrams and your BAC water — get per-component units for one syringe draw.
Open the blend calculator →Reconstitution basics
How much bacteriostatic water, mixing without shaking, storage, and shelf life once mixed.
Read the reconstitution guide →Other stacks in the library
BPC-157 + TB-500 + KPV, answered
What is the BPC-157 + TB-500 + KPV stack for?+
It's a research tissue-repair stack combining two repair peptides (different pathways) with an anti-inflammatory tripeptide.
Is the combination proven?+
No — components have their own (largely preclinical) evidence, but the blend isn't clinically validated: no controlled clinical trial of the BPC-157 + TB-500 + KPV combination has been published as of August 2026.
Is it legal or approved?+
It is not an approved product; research-market material is RUO, and BPC-157 and TB-500 are banned in sport (WADA). Verify local rules.
Does Peptigrity recommend a dose?+
No. Peptigrity is an independent review platform, not a medical authority.