COA 2603060152 matches freedomdiagnosticstesting.com's public record. So this test doesn't rest on our review alone — the lab confirms it too.
MRP2603060152This is a purity and identity analysis. Sterility, endotoxins, and heavy metals were not screened — a high purity figure says nothing about those.
Label 30 mg · Lab measured 34.13 mg
114% of label, basis not stated — shown as printed. Reconstituted with 2 mL, a 50-unit draw holds 8.5 mg using the measured mass, against 7.5 mg on the label — 14% more.
One vial from this lot was weighed by the laboratory, not yours. This page reports what the certificate says; it does not recommend a dose.
| Report number | 2603060152 |
|---|---|
| Portal lookup | ✓ Lab-verified |
| Checked | 14 Jul 2026date taken from the record, not from a logged check |
| Checked by | Peptigrity staff, against the lab's portal |
| PDF vs portal | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com's portal shows validity only |
| Weight | Counts as one lab test |
Independent HPLC purity analysis of GLP SM from modernresearchpeptides.net, performed by freedomdiagnosticstesting.com on March 27, 2026. Reported purity: 99.9%. Net content: 34.13 mg against 30 mg labeled (114% of label). Tested content exceeds the labeled amount by 14%. Batch EMIKSS0326. Sample source: shop-provided. Certificate of analysis attached.
| Lot | Tested | Lab | Purity | vs label | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81488WE | 24 Jun 2026 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.75% | 111% | ✓ Lab-verified |
| HKEMSS52601 | 12 Mar 2026 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.91% | 112% | ✓ Lab-verified |
| BCSM1SIKEM26 | 31 Jan 2026 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.61% | 145% | ✓ Lab-verified |
| EMTRSM20HBT | 9 Jan 2026 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.619% | 95% | ✓ Lab-verified |
Batches this shop has published a certificate for, newest first. A lot whose printed value cannot identify a batch is not listed.
Submit your third-party lab test to help the community verify purity claims. Every report is reviewed before publication.
Community discussion