GHK-Cu × valorpeptides.com — lab test, November 2025
Vanguard Laboratory publishes a public verification portal. Any test attributed to this lab can be looked up and confirmed directly with the lab — so this result doesn't rest on our review alone.
This certificate carries no lookup code.
Test results
This is a purity and identity analysis. Sterility, endotoxins, and heavy metals were not screened — a high purity figure says nothing about those.
About this test
Label 60 mg · Lab measured 67.9 mg
113% of label, basis not stated — shown as printed. Reconstituted with 2 mL, a 50-unit draw holds 17 mg using the measured mass, against 15 mg on the label — 13% more.
One vial from this lot was weighed by the laboratory, not yours. This page reports what the certificate says; it does not recommend a dose.
Independent HPLC purity analysis of GHK-Cu/KPV from valorpeptides.com, performed by Vanguard Laboratory on November 10, 2025. Reported purity: 99.5%. Net content: 67.9 mg against 60 mg labeled (113% of label). Tested content exceeds the labeled amount by 13%. Batch GHP001. Sample source: shop-provided. Certificate of analysis attached.
Certificate of analysis
Other lots of GHK-Cu from valorpeptides.com
| Lot | Tested | Lab | Purity | vs label | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARC-GL70-002 | 14 May 2026 | Accumark Labs | 98.94% | 111% | Lab has no portal |
| ARC-GHK50-002 | 14 Apr 2026 | Accumark Labs | 98.87% | 115% | Lab has no portal |
| GW0002 | 9 Apr 2026 | Accumark Labs | 99.25% | 104% | Lab has no portal |
| GHG002 | 10 Mar 2026 | Accumark Labs | 100% | 105% | Lab has no portal |
| GW0001 | 30 Oct 2025 | Vanguard Laboratory | 99% | 101% | Unverified |
| GH0001 | 18 Oct 2025 | Vanguard Laboratory | 99.8% | 103% | Unverified |
Batches this shop has published a certificate for, newest first. A lot whose printed value cannot identify a batch is not listed.
Have you tested this peptide?
Submit your third-party lab test to help the community verify purity claims. Every report is reviewed before publication.
Community discussion