This lab doesn't publish a public lookup, so we can't confirm the certificate against the lab's own record. The document was reviewed before publication, but it rests on our review alone.
What portal verification means →This is a purity and identity analysis. Sterility, endotoxins, and heavy metals were not screened — a high purity figure says nothing about those.
Label 100 mg · Lab measured 113 mg
113% of label, basis not stated — shown as printed. Reconstituted with 2 mL, a 50-unit draw holds 28.3 mg using the measured mass, against 25 mg on the label — 13% more.
One vial from this lot was weighed by the laboratory, not yours. This page reports what the certificate says; it does not recommend a dose.
| Report number | CR-GCU100-2603-1 |
|---|---|
| Portal lookup | Lab has no portalThis laboratory publishes no public lookup, so the report cannot be confirmed independently. |
| PDF vs portal | BTLabs's portal shows validity only |
| Weight | Counts as one lab test |
Independent HPLC purity analysis of GHK-Cu from crush research, performed by BTLabs on April 2, 2026. Reported purity: 99.7%. Net content: 113 mg against 100 mg labeled (113% of label). Tested content exceeds the labeled amount by 13%. Batch CR-GCU100-2603-1. Sample source: shop-provided. Certificate of analysis attached.
| Lot | Tested | Lab | Purity | vs label | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRGHK-100-2604-1 | 22 Apr 2026 | ILS Laboratories | 99.91% | 105% | Unverified |
| CRKLO-80-2604-1 | 22 Apr 2026 | ILS Laboratories | 99.47% | 104% | Unverified |
| CR-GHK100-0212-1 | 16 Feb 2026 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.86% | 107% | Unverified |
| CR-GHKC99-2511-1 | 15 Dec 2025 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.79% | 100% | Unverified |
| CRKL-80-1025-01 | 6 Nov 2025 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.77% | 122% | Unverified |
Batches this shop has published a certificate for, newest first. A lot whose printed value cannot identify a batch is not listed.
Submit your third-party lab test to help the community verify purity claims. Every report is reviewed before publication.
Community discussion