BPC-157 × luvionbio.com — lab test, August 2025
freedomdiagnosticstesting.com publishes a public verification portal. Any test attributed to this lab can be looked up and confirmed directly with the lab — so this result doesn't rest on our review alone.
This certificate carries no lookup code.
Test results
This is a purity and identity analysis. Sterility, endotoxins, and heavy metals were not screened — a high purity figure says nothing about those.
About this test
Label 5 mg · Lab measured 6.97 mg
139% of label, basis not stated — shown as printed. Reconstituted with 2 mL, a 50-unit draw holds 1.7 mg using the measured mass, against 1.3 mg on the label — 39% more.
One vial from this lot was weighed by the laboratory, not yours. This page reports what the certificate says; it does not recommend a dose.
Independent HPLC purity analysis of BPC-157 from luvionbio.com, performed by freedomdiagnosticstesting.com on August 2, 2025. Reported purity: 97.1%. Net content: 6.97 mg against 5 mg labeled (139% of label). Tested content exceeds the labeled amount by 39%. Batch LBL-0625-BC5-1040. Sample source: shop-provided. Certificate of analysis attached.
Certificate of analysis
Other lots of BPC-157 from luvionbio.com
| Lot | Tested | Lab | Purity | vs label | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBL-0226-BB20-1075 | 6 Mar 2026 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.925% | 113% | Unverified |
| LBL-0625-BCI0-1058 | 6 Mar 2026 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.458% | 110% | Unverified |
| LBL-0625-BC5-1040 | 18 Feb 2026 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.548% | 106% | Unverified |
| LBL-102-BB20-1075 | 28 Oct 2025 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.37% | 96% | Unverified |
| LBL-0625-BB20-1075 | 2 Aug 2025 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.03% | 102% | Unverified |
Batches this shop has published a certificate for, newest first. A lot whose printed value cannot identify a batch is not listed.
Have you tested this peptide?
Submit your third-party lab test to help the community verify purity claims. Every report is reviewed before publication.
Community discussion