5-Amino-1MQ × Regenerative Research peptides — lab test, August 2026
COA 2608202247 matches freedomdiagnosticstesting.com's public record. So this test doesn't rest on our review alone — the lab confirms it too.
Repr2608202247Test results
About this test
Label 50 mg · Lab measured 54.19 mg
108% of label, basis not stated — shown as printed. Reconstituted with 2 mL, a 50-unit draw holds 13.5 mg using the measured mass, against 12.5 mg on the label — 8% more.
One vial from this lot was weighed by the laboratory, not yours. This page reports what the certificate says; it does not recommend a dose.
| Report number | 2608202247 |
|---|---|
| Portal lookup | ✓ Lab-verified |
| Checked | 27 Aug 2026date taken from the record, not from a logged check |
| Checked by | Peptigrity staff, against the lab's portal |
| PDF vs portal | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com's portal shows validity only |
| Weight | Counts as one lab test |
Independent HPLC purity analysis of 5-Amino-1MQ from Regenerative Research peptides, performed by freedomdiagnosticstesting.com on August 25, 2026. Reported purity: 99%. Net content: 54.19 mg against 50 mg labeled (108% of label). Endotoxins: Pass. Heavy metals: ICP-MS: Pass — Arsenic, Cadmium, Lead, and Mercury below reporting/specification limits. Batch 12661B2B50. Sample source: shop-provided. Certificate of analysis attached.
Certificate of analysis
Other lots of 5-Amino-1MQ from Regenerative Research peptides
| Lot | Tested | Lab | Purity | vs label | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA26-01 | 20 Feb 2026 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.723% | 118% | Unverified |
| SA25-02 | 3 Oct 2025 | Krause Analytical | 99.44% | 95% | Unverified |
| Sa25-01 | 6 Aug 2025 | Krause Analytical | 98.72% | 95% | Unverified |
Batches this shop has published a certificate for, newest first. A lot whose printed value cannot identify a batch is not listed.
Have you tested this peptide?
Submit your third-party lab test to help the community verify purity claims. Every report is reviewed before publication.
Community discussion