Tesamorelin × blank peptides — lab test, July 2025
freedomdiagnosticstesting.com publishes a public verification portal. Any test attributed to this lab can be looked up and confirmed directly with the lab — so this result doesn't rest on our review alone.
This certificate carries no lookup code.
Test results
This is a purity and identity analysis. Sterility, endotoxins, and heavy metals were not screened — a high purity figure says nothing about those.
About this test
Label 10 mg · Lab measured 9.12 mg
91% of label, basis not stated — shown as printed. Reconstituted with 2 mL, a 50-unit draw holds 2.3 mg using the measured mass, against 2.5 mg on the label — 9% less.
One vial from this lot was weighed by the laboratory, not yours. This page reports what the certificate says; it does not recommend a dose.
Independent HPLC purity analysis of Tesamorelin from blank peptides, performed by freedomdiagnosticstesting.com on July 23, 2025. Reported purity: 99.6%. Net content: 9.12 mg against 10 mg labeled (91% of label). Batch 250370-P4R. Sample source: shop-provided. Certificate of analysis attached.
Certificate of analysis
Other lots of Tesamorelin from blank peptides
| Lot | Tested | Lab | Purity | vs label | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B-3699671-P | 16 Jun 2026 | Horizon Analytical | 99.37% | 100% | Unverified |
| TES10-062026-1 | 15 Jun 2026 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.62% | 117% | ✓ Lab-verified |
| 665394 | 7 Apr 2026 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.08% | 106% | Unverified |
| 71096-P | 24 Feb 2026 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.193% | 129% | Unverified |
| TESM08252025-J | 28 Aug 2025 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.16% | 102% | Unverified |
| TES1008182025-12 | 21 Aug 2025 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.54% | 116% | Unverified |
Batches this shop has published a certificate for, newest first. A lot whose printed value cannot identify a batch is not listed.
Have you tested this peptide?
Submit your third-party lab test to help the community verify purity claims. Every report is reviewed before publication.
Community discussion