MOTS-C × modernresearchpeptides.net — lab test, June 2026
COA 2606080661 matches freedomdiagnosticstesting.com's public record. So this test doesn't rest on our review alone — the lab confirms it too.
MRP2606080661Test results
This is a purity and identity analysis. Sterility, endotoxins, and heavy metals were not screened — a high purity figure says nothing about those.
About this test
Label 10 mg · Lab measured 9.61 mg
96% of label, basis not stated — shown as printed. Reconstituted with 2 mL, a 50-unit draw holds 2.4 mg using the measured mass, against 2.5 mg on the label — 4% less.
One vial from this lot was weighed by the laboratory, not yours. This page reports what the certificate says; it does not recommend a dose.
| Report number | 2606080661 |
|---|---|
| Portal lookup | ✓ Lab-verified |
| Checked | 14 Jul 2026date taken from the record, not from a logged check |
| Checked by | Peptigrity staff, against the lab's portal |
| PDF vs portal | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com's portal shows validity only |
| Weight | Counts as one lab test |
Independent HPLC purity analysis of MOTS-C from modernresearchpeptides.net, performed by freedomdiagnosticstesting.com on June 10, 2026. Reported purity: 99.63%. Net content: 9.61 mg against 10 mg labeled (96% of label). Batch 823578. Sample source: shop-provided. Certificate of analysis attached.
Certificate of analysis
Other lots of MOTS-C from modernresearchpeptides.net
| Lot | Tested | Lab | Purity | vs label | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GKHC2624 | 27 Apr 2026 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.17% | 109% | ✓ Lab-verified |
| WCHKRS2601 | 12 Mar 2026 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.38% | 88% | ✓ Lab-verified |
| EMRT1025 | 9 Jan 2026 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.375% | 94% | ✓ Lab-verified |
Batches this shop has published a certificate for, newest first. A lot whose printed value cannot identify a batch is not listed.
Have you tested this peptide?
Submit your third-party lab test to help the community verify purity claims. Every report is reviewed before publication.
Community discussion