KPV × crush research — lab test, lot CR-KPV10-2603-1, April 2026
This lab doesn't publish a public lookup, so we can't confirm the certificate against the lab's own record. The document was reviewed before publication, but it rests on our review alone.
What portal verification means →Test results
This is a purity and identity analysis. Sterility, endotoxins, and heavy metals were not screened — a high purity figure says nothing about those.
About this test
Label 10 mg · Lab measured 8.2 mg
82% of label, basis not stated — shown as printed. Reconstituted with 2 mL, a 50-unit draw holds 2.1 mg using the measured mass, against 2.5 mg on the label — 18% less.
One vial from this lot was weighed by the laboratory, not yours. This page reports what the certificate says; it does not recommend a dose.
| Report number | CR-KPV10-2603-1 |
|---|---|
| Portal lookup | Lab has no portalThis laboratory publishes no public lookup, so the report cannot be confirmed independently. |
| PDF vs portal | BTLabs's portal shows validity only |
| Weight | Counts as one lab test |
Independent HPLC purity analysis of KPV from crush research, performed by BTLabs on April 2, 2026. Reported purity: 99.8%. Net content: 8.2 mg against 10 mg labeled (82% of label). Tested content is 18% below the labeled amount. Batch CR-KPV10-2603-1. Sample source: shop-provided. Certificate of analysis attached.
Certificate of analysis
Other lots of KPV from crush research
| Lot | Tested | Lab | Purity | vs label | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRKPV-10-2604-1 | 22 Apr 2026 | ILS Laboratories | 99.36% | 104% | Unverified |
| CR-KPV010-2601-1 | 8 Jan 2026 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.78% | 106% | Unverified |
| CR-KPV010-2511-1 | 19 Nov 2025 | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com | 99.29% | 110% | Unverified |
Batches this shop has published a certificate for, newest first. A lot whose printed value cannot identify a batch is not listed.
Have you tested this peptide?
Submit your third-party lab test to help the community verify purity claims. Every report is reviewed before publication.
Community discussion