✓ Purity · pass✓ Lab-verifiedBatch · Black CapShop-provided sample
KLOW × ascend.science peptides — lab test, May 2026
Tested · submitted by Peptigrity Team Member 02PEPTIGRITY TEAM
Sample source: shop-provided. The shop chose and sent this vial. Samples bought at retail by a member carry more weight.How we weigh evidence →
HPLC Purity
99.78%
✓ Excellent purity only
Independently confirmed on the lab’s portal✓ Extra check
COA 2605070271 matches freedomdiagnosticstesting.com's public record. So this test doesn't rest on our review alone — the lab confirms it too.
Lookup code
Asce2605070271Look it up on freedomdiagnosticstesting.com ↗Checked May 9, 2026
Test results
5 data points
Purity
99.78%
Endotoxins
Pass, Assay Sensitivity: ≤0.05 EU/mL
Heavy metals
Not tested
Stated qty
Not provided
Tested qty
Not provided
Batch / Lot
Black Cap
COA number
2605070271
Container
Blue Lyophilized Powder
Tested by
freedomdiagnosticstesting.comView profile →
This is a purity and identity analysis. Sterility, endotoxins, and heavy metals were not screened — a high purity figure says nothing about those.
About this test
Verification trail
| Report number | 2605070271 |
|---|---|
| Portal lookup | ✓ Lab-verified |
| Checked | 15 Jul 2026date taken from the record, not from a logged check |
| Checked by | Peptigrity staff, against the lab's portal |
| PDF vs portal | freedomdiagnosticstesting.com's portal shows validity only |
| Weight | Counts as one lab test |
Independent HPLC purity analysis of KLOW from ascend.science peptides, performed by freedomdiagnosticstesting.com on May 9, 2026. Reported purity: 99.78%. Endotoxins: Pass, Assay Sensitivity: ≤0.05 EU/mL. Batch Black Cap. Sample source: shop-provided. Certificate of analysis attached.
Certificate of analysis
Original document
Issued by freedomdiagnosticstesting.com · May 09, 2026 · Batch Black Cap
♡ Likes · 0
No comments yet. Sign in to discuss this test →
Have you tested this peptide?
Submit your third-party lab test to help the community verify purity claims. Every report is reviewed before publication.
Community discussion